After thirty years of battles and betrayals, David finally becomes the king of Israel, after conquering Jerusalem. His opponents tell him it’s impossible to enter the city, and yet David manages to win the city, and then make it Israel’s new center.

Statue of King David by Nicolas Cordier in the Borghese Chapel of the Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore.
Image via Wikimedia Commons. Photo by Marie-Lan Nguyen.

Roger Nam writes on this passage for Working Preacher.

Scripture text can be found here.

Uniting the nation of Israel, under God’s rule, is a chaotic process. Our story gives us a snippet of one of the many battles fought by David before he becomes Israel’s king. Warfare is a bloody undertaking, and the story doesn’t spare the details of betrayals, killings and mutilations. Along the way, David conquers the city of Jerusalem, and turns it into the nation’s capital. As a final sign of triumph, he moves the ark to Jerusalem, dancing with joy as the ark travels.

This fulfills a long-ago provision by God to make David Israel’s king. Years ago (1 Samuel 16:13) God rejected Saul as Israel’s king, and sent the prophet Samuel to anoint David as the new king. After that time, “the spirit of the Lord came mightily upon David from that day forward.” Still, God’s work’s is slow, and years go by before David actually is the nation’s king.

To make David the king, “all the tribes of Israel came to David at Hebron, and said, ‘Look, we are your bone and flesh. 2For some time, while Saul was king over us, it was you who led out Israel and brought it in. The Lord said to you: It is you who shall be shepherd of my people Israel, you who shall be ruler over Israel.’ 3So all the elders of Israel came to the king at Hebron; and King David made a covenant with them at Hebron before the Lord, and they anointed David king over Israel.” God has already anointed David but the voice of the people confirms God’s choice. Valued for his battle skills, David’s greatest triumph comes when he conquers Jerusalem.

The text has some jarring notes, mostly left out by the lectionary selection of verses. The story is written from Israel’s point of view, and so the people who already lived in the “promised land” are just obstacles to be conquered. The mention of the blind and lame in the text is problematic – it hits our ears oddly, with our understanding of people who have disabilities. The word “lame” is rightly disappearing from our common language, and is no longer an acceptable adjective even for something that didn’t go well. And the lectionary stops before the story of the unfortunate Uzzah, who reaches out to straighten out the ark as it travels, and is struck dead by God for touching it. The lectionary leaves these stories out, but they help us understand the multi-layered story of our faith, and the connections between our ancestors in faith and the land around them.

Sermon possibilities:

  • David has a long apprenticeship before he becomes the king. He first plays the lyre for King Saul when Saul is tormented, and serves as Saul’s armor-bearer (16:21.) Along the way, he sees the stresses of being king, and observes the battles against Israel’s enemies. There’s a long gap between God’s choice of David as the next king, and this story, when he is chosen by the people as their next king. Have you ever experienced a similar gap in your own life – the time between something ending, and something new beginning? Or a time when God was ripening something, and getting it ready? Similar things happen to communities of people. Is God preparing something in your faith community, something that’s taking shape slowly?
  • David’s kingship is presented as a choice by God, but also by the people, who come to David and ask him to be their king. My tradition, the Presbyterian Church (USA) understands ordained office, including both ministers and church officers, in the same way. God’s call is confirmed by the voice of the people. How does that dual process work in your tradition? Is the voice of the people a way to reign in our temptation to self-promotion, or self-delusion?
  • Long ago, the prophet Samuel warned the new nation of Israel that they didn’t really want a king, but the people insisted. Is there something in us that needs to have someone in charge? What do we look for in a leader? There are different styles of leadership, and the sermon might talk about those in light of our faith. David is chosen by the people for his battle skills. What qualities do we need now, in our faith communities?

What are your thoughts? Join the conversation in the comments below. We’re eager to hear where you’re going this week.

*****
RevGalBlogPals encourages you to share our blog posts via email or social media. We do not grant permission to cut-and-paste prayers and articles without a link back. For permission to use material in paper publications, please email revgalblogpals at gmail dot com.
*****

11 thoughts on “Narrative Lectionary: King at Last! (2 Samuel 5:1-5, 6:1-5)

  1. Thanks for starting the thinking for me this week. I confess I would rather preach 10 weeks in a row on Ruth and skip over this passage. Will let you know if I come up with any ideas.

    Like

  2. I do like thinking of David’s wait between being anointed and taking the throne as an apprenticeship. It’s both Reformation Sunday in my tradition and Confirmation Sunday at my congregations. I think I may be able to work with the idea of apprenticeship – God training us, correcting us as both the church and the people who make up the body grow in faith.

    Like

      1. Marci, sorry for the slow response — by now I’m sure you’ve answered your own question. For me, it came up reading the texts before this one. Samuel coming to the farm to look over Jesse’s sons, and finally choosing David, the youngest, as the next king. Then he works for Saul as his armor-bearer, and, it seems, gets to listen to all the chatter about war and battles. (1 Samuel 16) He takes on Goliath, and gets a taste of his own capabilities, and then there are many years of battles. He has to break with Saul and live through Saul trying to kill him. It seems to me that all of that is seasoning him to actually become the king. I’m interested in the gap between when Samuel anoints him and when the people come to him and ask him to be the king…and all that he learns in that time.

        Liked by 1 person

  3. I confess that I wish we had the next part of chapter 6 instead of chapter 5….I not-so-secretly love the part where Uzzah tries to protect God/control the ark and gets struck dead.
    Alas.

    The theme for this week here is “praise”–so I’ve titled the sermon “Sacrifice of Praise” (which is a phrase in traditional liturgy but rarely used in this congregation) and I’ll be focusing on that bit about pulling out all the stops to praise God as they bring the ark in.

    The NL Facebook group has several discussions going about tying this text to Reformation Sunday by connecting the idea that David was bringing the ark (which contained the word) back to the center of Israelite consciousness/worship/society/whatever with the idea that The Reformers (I feel like that should be trademarked, lol) were bringing the word back to the center of the church’s life and consciousness. I don’t know if I’ll go there, but it’s an interesting rabbit trail.

    Like

    1. Teri, I find myself feeling a little bad for Uzzah. He keeps the ark from falling to the ground, and the Lord smites him — it seems unjust. And then David’s reaction is almost comic: “I’m not taking that thing with me. You keep it!”

      Like

  4. interesting in reading the bible this summer in 90 days this story upset lots of folks, a little research revealed God had given directions as to how to carry that cart, and it was not on a cart. So haste made more than waste. I’m going with the waiting and preparedness theme as we have been slowly moving in a transition process for several years.

    Like

We hope you'll join the conversation!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.